AS English Language
#2: Language in Social Contexts
Language and Gender
There seem to be a difference between how men and women use language, but no-one seems to be sure exactly what they are or why they occur. Studies have shown that women tend to use accents from a higher social class than men:
Peter Trudgill (1983) studied men and women’s social accents and found that women’s pronunciation was closer to Received Pronunciation (RP), the accent that is usually seen as the most prestigious. Using Standard English and RP gives a person overt prestige – the prestige of being associated with a respectable, well-off section of society.
Cheshire (1982) studied the speech of adolescent girls and boys and found that boys tended to use more non-standard grammatical forms than girls. Using non-standard English gives a person covert prestige. They seem a bit rebellious and independent. Men are more likely to seek covert prestige than women. This may be to be respected by friends, colleagues, or others.
Lakoff (1975) identified features she felt were characteristic of women's speech: hedges and fillers, apologestic requests, tag questions and indirect requests. She also pointed out that women tend to speak less than men, use fewer expletives and more intensifiers. She argues that these features reflected women’s inferior social status. She said that women’s language is weak compared to men’s language, and this prevents women from being taken seriously. This explanation is called the deficit model.
O’Barr and Atkins (1980) suggested an alternative explanation to the deficit model. They analysed American courtroom trials, and found that male and female witnesses who were of low social status and/or inexperienced with the courtroom practices, both showed many of the liguistic features that Lakoff labelled female. This suggests that the kind of language Lakoff describes as female is not only found in women, but might be more to do with individuals feeling powerless.
Cameron (2007) argues that there are few differences between men and women’s language, and situation affects how people speak much more than gender.
Language can be explained in terms of dominance and difference. Zimmerman and West (1975) recorded interruptions in conversations between men and women, and found that 96% of the interruptions were by men. This suggested that men are more dominant in male-female conversation, and Zimmerman and West therefore argued that this reflects dominance in society. On the other hand, Tannen (1990) described male and female conversational style in terms of difference. Men are concerned with status and independence, whilst women are interested in forming bods. Men give direct orders and don’t mind conflict, whilst women usually give polite, indirect orders and try to avoid conflict. Also, men are interested in gaining factual information and finding solutions to problems, whilst women aim to show understading by compromising, and offering support rather than solutions.
There are problems with these explanations. Other researchers have cast doubts on some of the explanations of differences in male and female language. Beattie (1982) suggested that interruptions could be supportive and show that the person is listening. Cameron (2007) argues that a lot of research is biased because there has been more focus on the differences between male and female language, rather than the similarities.
Les mer = Read more...
Language can be explained in terms of dominance and difference. Zimmerman and West (1975) recorded interruptions in conversations between men and women, and found that 96% of the interruptions were by men. This suggested that men are more dominant in male-female conversation, and Zimmerman and West therefore argued that this reflects dominance in society. On the other hand, Tannen (1990) described male and female conversational style in terms of difference. Men are concerned with status and independence, whilst women are interested in forming bods. Men give direct orders and don’t mind conflict, whilst women usually give polite, indirect orders and try to avoid conflict. Also, men are interested in gaining factual information and finding solutions to problems, whilst women aim to show understading by compromising, and offering support rather than solutions.
There are problems with these explanations. Other researchers have cast doubts on some of the explanations of differences in male and female language. Beattie (1982) suggested that interruptions could be supportive and show that the person is listening. Cameron (2007) argues that a lot of research is biased because there has been more focus on the differences between male and female language, rather than the similarities.
Les mer = Read more...